Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogBradley on Herring v. United States
By Lawrence Solum
(Trial Magazine, April 2009) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
- This article discusses Herring v. United States in which the Court held, 5-4, that evidence found after the defendant was arrested due to faulty information provided by a police from another county would not be excluded. The holding was narrow: "When police mistakes leading to an unlawful search are the result of isolated negligence attenuated from the search, rather than systemic error or reckless disregard of constitutional requirements, the exclusionary rule should not apply." However, the opinion contains much language suggesting that the Court is prepared to abandon the rule, which has been the foundation of criminal procedure since 1961. This article discusses just what Herring held, and what its implications may be.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on March 26, 2009 (boomark / email).
Recall of TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count Sold in The United States and Puerto Rico
TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count One Lot Recalled in US and Puerto Rico
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
Cilantro
Recalled in 5 States
Lettuce
Recalled in 29 States due to Salmonella
Salmonella Outbreak
50 People Sick in Five States
Mars Petcare
Issues Recall of Special Kitty Gourmet in 15 States

Herring v. United States, and "Who Are The Police"
Responding to Tom Goldstein on Herring:
Supreme Court Hands Down Herring v. United States:
Herring, Barney Fife, and Elephants
"Eroding the Exclusionary Rule: Why the Supreme Court got it wrong in Herring v. United States."
Oral Argument in Herring v. United States:









