ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> FindLaw's Common Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: FindLaw's Common Law

Miss Montana Jennifer Hepner's DUI Case: Implied Consent Law and License Suspension

ADVERTISEMENTS

The current Miss Montana, Jennifer Hepner, has pled not guilty in a DUI case stemming from a traffic stop in January of 2009, according to the AP. Since that time she has been suspended from her pageant duties, but gets to keep her tiara until the next Miss Montana comes around.

The AP gave the following background regarding Hepner's traffic stop and resulting charges:

"The 23-year-old University of Montana graduate student had been pulled over Jan. 3 and refused to submit to alcohol screening, breath or blood tests. Her license was seized and suspended.

The Bozeman Daily Chronicle reported Wednesday that Hepner has pleaded not guilty. She is also fighting the license suspension.

Her lawyer says her requests to speak with an attorney during the traffic stop were denied."

Noteably, however, Montana has implied consent DUI laws. As a result, anyone who drives in the state gives permission to police to conduct a preliminary alcohol screening test of their breath for alcohol concentration, so long as an officer has "a particularized suspicion" that they were driving while under the influence. Even though the driver actually does have a right to refuse this preliminary test, the consequence is a driver's license suspension. Also, a similar implied consent rule applies in Montana for blood and breath tests after a person has been arrested. The arrestee can still refuse to be tested, but this will result in automatic license suspension penalties.

Finally, although the circumstances of Miss Montana's case are unclear, it should be noted that someone's constitutional right to counsel doesn't stretch to the point that someone can demand an attorney and refuse to answer any and all questions during a simple traffic stop. Police are permitted to ask basic questions during a stop regarding a driver's identity and requisite documentation. Indeed, a refusal to answer those questions can be grounds for an arrest, in the first place. On the other hand, individuals are allowed to refuse to answer other questions without an attorney present.

Full post as published by FindLaw's Common Law on March 26, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0188 secs (new cache)