ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights

Ground Control to Major Tom: DOL Issues "Opinion" on Exempt Status of Pilots

By Mark E. Tabakman, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

I have often addressed the issue of Department of Labor Opinion Letters and how they provide very good guidance on the myriad wage-hour issues that employers must deal with. They are useful because they highlight the DOL's thinking on any given issue, which, if then followed by an employer, gives that employer a 'safe harbor' from any allegation that it has violated the Fair Labor Standards Act.

In Wage and Hour Opinion Letter FLSA 2009-6 (January 14, 2009), the issue was whether jet and helicopter pilots for a corporation were exempt as executives or professionals. Although the DOL could not definitively answer the particular question, since the company did not provide enough information for the agency to make a determination, the DOL reaffirmed its position of 'non-enforcement' relating to pilots performing who flew aircraft as business or company pilots. This means that, essentially, the DOL will not investigate overtime claims by such employees and will 'treat' these workers as exempt.

This company employed eight full-time pilots. They transported executives, customers, and guests to meetings/company facilities. All of the pilots held commercial pilot licenses and they all met/exceeded the Federal Aviation Administration requirements for acting as a pilot in command. The DOL tried to consider whether the 'chief pilot' would be exempt under the executive exemption, but the FLSA regulations mandate that an exempt executive have, as his 'primary duty' the management of an 'enterprise or a customarily recognized department of subdivision thereof.' Thus, the chief pilot would not neatly fit this cubbyhole.

The Opinion Letter also noted that the DOL has long considered pilots to be non-exempt as learned professional employees, but nevertheless took a position of 'non-enforcement' as far as certain pilots were concerned. This non-enforcement view applies to pilots and co-pilots who: 1) possess a FAA airline transport certificate or commercial certificate 2) receive compensation on a salary or fee basis of at least $455 per week; and, 3) engage in one of nine categories of aerial work, such as test flights, aerial photography, and meteorological research. One of the categories covered by the agency's non-enforcement policy is 'flying of aircraft as business or company pilots.'

The point here is that sometimes the DOL will simply back away from determination of the exempt status of a particular classification, especially if it is gray area and if the employees at issue are sufficiently well compensated so the DOL believes that 'overtime' may not be a real issue for them.
 

Full post as published by Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights on March 26, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0164 secs (new cache)