ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Bernie?s in Jail, But Will He Stay There?

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

Earlier today, Judge Denny Chin revoked Bernie Madoff’s bail and ordered him straight to the Manhattan Correctional Center in lower Manhattan, described on its Web site as an “administrative facility housing male and female pre-trial and holdover inmates.” Madoff will likely stay there until June 16 — the date of his sentencing and the 105th anniversary of Leopold Bloom’s famous walk through Dublin. (We’re not sure what the connection is here, but any Ulysses buffs out there, feel free to let us know.)

However, Madoff’s lawyer, Ike Sorkin, earlier today indicated he intended to appeal the bail order to the Second Circuit. The move sounded a little strange to us, given what we learned about bail yesterday.

Still, we decided to look into the issue, to figure out if Madoff is likely to see the inside of his apartment again. We called Orrick partner McGregor Scott, the former U.S. Attorney in Sacramento, to find out.

Hi Greg, what are your thoughts on the bail issue?

Under federal law, the presumption is that once the defendant enters a guilty plea, he or she is remanded into custody unless district judge makes a finding that the person does not pose a flight risk or is a danger to the community. The bottom line is that once someone enters a guilty plea, burden shifts to the defense and absent that showing, he goes to jail.

Sounds like you think an appeal on this issue is a longshot, eh?

Well, appellate courts typically give great discretion to the district court judge in this type of situation. Frankly, it’s very difficult to see any set of circumstances under which the Second Circuit would reverse Judge Chin on this.

Let’s play devil’s advocate for a minute. Can’t Madoff’s lawyers argue that he’s already proven that he’s not a flight risk or that he poses a danger to society? After all, didn’t he play by the rules over the past few months?

Well, they can, but I just don’t see it. He’s in a different place now, he’s been convicted of a massive fraud. The government is looking to recoup $170 billion, so it probably thinks he still has access to great amounts of money that he theoretically use to flee the country.

Sounds like you think this is a done deal?

Looks like it, I’m afraid.

Thanks for taking the time.

My pleasure.

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on March 12, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0141 secs (new cache)