Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Georgia Injury Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Georgia Injury Lawyer BlogDANGEROUS MEDICAL DEVICES AND DOCTORS
Lawyers who practice in the field of dangerous medical devices and drugs are never surprised to discover relationships between physicians and pharmaceutical and medical device companies. Recently, questionable ties between supposedly objective researchers and the maker of an artificial spinal disk have come to light. An artificial spinal disk is a device that is used in place of conventional surgery during which patients? vertebrae are fused.
In a study of nearly 240 patients with lower back pain, physicians reported that the artificial spine disk, manufactured by Prodisc, had worked much better than conventional fusion surgeries. A well-known spine specialist and one of the study?s researchers said in a 2006 news release that ?as a surgeon, it is gratifying to see patients recover function more quickly than after fusion and return to their normal activities more easily.?
Discovery in a lawsuit against the manufacturer has disclosed that the surgeon had a large financial interest in the outcome of the study. So did other doctors at about half of the 17 research centers involved in the study. Federal law requires that manufacturers inform the Food and Drug Administration of researchers? financial interest in a product or drug before the study is used to seek approval of a device. It is unclear whether the disk?s manufacturer made this information available to the FDA.
In the study results submitted to the FDA , an unusually large number of patients were not included. Some of those patients had very poor results. As a result, some doctors are very critical of the research stating that the study may have overstated the value of Prodisc. They point out that clinical researchers with financial conflicts have incentives to overstate the value of a new product.
Dr. Richard A. Deyo, a Professor at Oregon Health and Science University, summed up the matter in this way, ?The surgeons themselves are guilty of being insufficiently critical of products and techniques they are developing. More people are more interested in getting on the gravy train than on stopping the gravy train.?
Full post as published by Georgia Injury Lawyer Blog on February 05, 2008 (boomark / email).
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
Military Veterans Benefits, Part 2
Training, Healthcare, and Death Benefits
Hayes Bicycle Group
Recalls Quick-Release Devices
Placebos Instead of Meds
Nearly Half of US Doctors Involved
Plavix and Nexium
A Potentially Dangerous Combination
VW Passat
allegedly linked to dangerous engine fires.
Pillows in Cribs
CPSC Warns of Dangerous to Babies
Health Insurance
alleging health insurance companies have forced patients to pay more than they should when using doctors and hospitals outside their insurer's networks.

Beware of Dangerous Shelhigh Medical Devices
Consumer Ads for Medical Devices Subject of Senate Panel
Cellular Phones and Driving the Medical Community Wades In
Medtronic Accused by Own Lawyer of Pervasive Kickbacks to Physicians
CT Scans May Cause Medical Device Malfunction
New GAO Reports: Medical Devices, Health Savings Accounts, U.S.-China Trade







