Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> LaborProf Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: LaborProf BlogSupremes Say Courts Should "Look Through" Arbitration Agreements to Determine Jurisdiction
ADVERTISEMENTS
The U.S. Supreme Court today decided Vaden v. Discover Bank, which raised issue about federal question jurisdiction under the Federal Arbitration Act. I've only briefly reviewed the decision, but Ross Runkel has done a thorough analysis. Here's his summary; jump...Full post as published by LaborProf Blog on March 09, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Cal Supremes ponder arbitration of client claims
The Devil's in the Details When It Comes to Michigan Arbitration Agreements
Discover Wins Battle, Loses War in FAA Section 4 Interpretation Battle Before U.S. Supreme Court
Arbitration Agreements Increasing
Vaden v Discover Bank: Federal courts "look through" arbitration petition to determine jurisdiction







