Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Local Law Blogs Blogs -> New Jersey Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Local Law Blogs
: New Jersey Law BlogA Panoramic Discussion of the Squeeze-Out Techniques Often Used By Majority Shareholders
The purpose of this blog entry is to provide a brief list of the squeeze-out techniques often used by majority shareholders in their effort to oppress minority shareholders. The list which follows is merely illustrates of some of the techniques I often encounter with regard to my representation of oppressed minority shareholders. Of course, this list is not exclusive.
Generally, 'oppression has been defined as frustrating a shareholder's reasonable expectations.' Brenner v. Berkowitz, 134 N.J. 488, 506 (1993) (citing, 2 O'Neil's Close Corporations § 9.29 at 132 (Callaghan & Co., 3rd ed. 1988)). The following situations could constitute actionable unlawful 'oppression' where the majority:
has cut off the flow of income to the minority owner by refusing to declare dividends; terminated the employment of the minority or their family members; removed the minority from the board of directors; decided to award themselves (or their family members) exorbitant salaries and/or bonuses; diverted corporate assets to other corporations which are owned by the majority and not the minority; siphoned off corporate assets by entering into leases or loans with terms favorable to the majority while at the same time detrimental to the minority; refused to enforce contracts that are beneficial to the corporation because the enforcement of those contracts would be personally detrimental to the majority; withheld company information; embezzled company assets; and/or acted fraudulently towards the corporation, which, in turn affects the minority shareholder.
In blog articles to follow, I will go into greater detail as to the majority's use of the afore-described squeeze-out techniques along with how a minority shareholder may employ the law to fight back.
Full post as published by New Jersey Law Blog on February 27, 2009 (boomark / email).
Grubb & Ellis
alleging violations of fiduciary duties to shareholders and securities laws.
Common Stock Shareholders
LaBranche & Co. LLC agrees to $13 million securities fraud class action settlement.

"The Big Squeeze" and the Uncorporation
Not Just One Big Squeeze, But Many Squeezes
Should Shareholders Have Fiduciary Duties
Greenhouse on the Big Squeeze and Some More Employment Numbers
Remedies for Michigan Minority Shareholder Oppression








