Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> FindLaw's Common Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: FindLaw's Common LawCalifornia 'Violent' Video Game Restrictions Ruled Unconstitutional
A California law that places sale restrictions and labeling requirements on certain violent video games is unconstitutionally broad and violates free speech guarantees, according to a federal appeals court decision issued Friday.
The 2005 California law prohibits the sale or rental of "violent video games" to minors under 18 years of age, and requires that such games be distributed with a prominent "18" label on their packaging. A constitutional challenge to the law was brought by a number of companies that create, manufacturer, and distribute video games. In Friday's unanimous decision, a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concluded that "the State has not produced substantial evidence that supports the Legislature?s conclusion that violent video games cause psychological or neurological harm to minors. Even if it did, the Act is not narrowly tailored to prevent that harm and there remain less restrictive means of forwarding the State?s purported interests, such as the improved [software] rating system, enhanced educational campaigns, and parental controls." Furthermore, the court concluded, the labeling requirement constitutes impermissibly compelled speech under the First Amendment.
Reuters reports that Friday's decision, in which the court "found that the labeling requirement unfairly forces video games to carry 'the state's controversial opinion' about which games are violent," may have "a far-reaching impact on efforts by other states to establish mandatory video game labeling requirements."
- Read the Decision: Video Software Dealers Association v. Schwarzenegger [PDF file]
- Reuters: Court Finds Calif. Video Game Law Unconstitutional
- S.F. Chronicle: Ruling Against Age Limit on Game Sales Upheld
- Santa Rosa Press Democrat Blog: Picking Through Friday's Appeals Court Ruling on Violent Game Law
- Reuters 2/6/2009: Playing Violent Video Games Has Risks: Study
- Washington Post 11/3/08: Study Links Violent Video Games, Hostility
- Video Games: Reading the Ratings on the Games People Play (Federal Trade Commission)
- Parents Reminded to View Video Game Ratings (Washington Attorney General)
- Parenting Tips and Keeping Your Child Safe (FindLaw)
Full post as published by FindLaw's Common Law on February 23, 2009 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Dumb California Laws
Stupid Laws in the Sunshine State
Nintendo Control
Video game giant to pay $21 million settlement in patent lawsuit.
Sprint Nextel
Early Termination Fees Ruled Illegal in California
Media/Telecom
consumer rights involving print, radio, television, video, DVD, video games, and mobile telephones.
Florida, USA
alleging restrictions too tight on Medicaid recipients.
New York, NY and the NYPD
alleging false arrest for violating an unconstitutional anti-loitering law.
International Game Technology
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud

California Violent Video Game Law Held Unconstitutional,
Ninth Circuit Kills Governators Violent Video Game Bill
REVIVING YEE'S VIDEO GAME LEGISLATION IN CALIFORNIA
NY Passes Video Game Display Bill
Court Upholds Injunction on Minnesota Violent Game Law








