Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> Nancy Rapoport's Blogspot
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: Nancy Rapoport's BlogspotLet's play "connect the dots"
By Nancy Rapoport
Well, Nevada's economy is pretty awful right now, and as things stand, higher education cuts are poised to bear the brunt of Nevada's attempt to balance the budget (the first piece). Virtually everyone in Nevada is suffering from plummeting housing prices (the second piece). And our local newspapers are still clamoring to get rid of Yucca Mountain (the third piece).
I'm still waiting to read reporting of the millions (possibly billions) of dollars that working with the federal government on envisioning Yucca as a safe place to store waste would have meant (and could still mean) for Nevada. We're talking regular infusions of cash here, plus studies by independent scientists (NOT the same folks who brought above-ground nuclear testing to Nevada in the last century, and who said that such testing was "safe") to make sure that nothing would go in the ground that posed a real risk for Nevadans. We're talking about jobs in Clark County (where Las Vegas is located) and Pahrump (Nye County, near the Yucca Mountain site). We're talking about people who, instead of facing layoffs and possible foreclosures, could pay their bills and keep their houses.
I may be biased, but the idea that Nevada should reject funding from the Federal government during the investigatory phase (the "will Yucca work and be safe?" phase) because it prefers to stick its head in the sand seems a bit short-sighted to me.
My guess is that the newspapers haven't polled Nevadans recently with the following question: would you rather that your state accept some federal funding while Yucca is being debated, or would you prefer to reject federal funding while your economy goes down the tubes?
Full post as published by Nancy Rapoport's Blogspot on February 22, 2009 (boomark / email).
Suffocation Hazard Prompts Recall of Play Yards with Bassinets
Dorel Play Yards with Bassinets Recalled due to Suffocation Hazard
Taggies Sleepn' Play
16,000 Garments Recalled
Kolcraft
Recalls 1 Million Play Yards
Construction Play Sets
Recalled for Toxic Lead Paint
Step 2
Recalls Play Gym Sets Sold Exclusively at Toys R Us
Triple Play Products
Recalls Sit 'N' Stroll Child Restraint Systems

US Patent 7367505 - Quantum dot dispensing and detecting
The important point that Kennedy v. Louisiana proves about Boumediene v. Bush
Recalled Aqua Dots Still Being Advertised
US Patent 7414294 - Intermediate band core/shell quantum dots provided in organic matrix
Economy, Unrest and Porn in 2009








