ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Law Daily

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: IP Law Daily

Copying as transformation43(B)log

ADVERTISEMENTS
Henry Lowood, Found Technology: Players as Innovators in the Making of Machinima, in Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected (Tara McPherson ed., 2008) (The John D. and Catherine T.MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning)

Given that courts have occasionally suggested that, for fair use purposes, the line between transformative and nontransformative uses is whether an unauthorized use brings out and emphasizes or exaggerates some characteristic that was already in the original text, I was especially interested in Lowood?s description of a machinima movie set in World of Warcraft that told a Romeo-and-Juliet story about the love between a troll and a human.

The reason this story ?specifically drew attention to issues of creative ownership of the story world? was that the programmers had intended trolls and humans to be engaged in ?relentless and unremitting conflict.? Indeed, they had implemented this intention by making it impossible for trolls and humans to communicate in-game. Trolls and humans could not chat together; speech by one group was garbled by the game into gibberish instead of presented to the other group; and the software even filtered out ?subversive attempts to communicate by embedding text in descriptive gestures, known as ?emotes.??

Such extremes of denial can be expected to produce resistance. The story of forbidden love ? and the massive collaboration between troll and human players required to film the movie ? showed that the players had a different view of the inevitability of conflict. As the credits said, ?Even without leet speak you cannot take away our love!?

At the same time, the film was made using only materials that the game made available. Pope, the creator, simulated sexual situations ?through character positions and camera angles in the video.? He was incapable of changing the server-based program. It was thus in one sense inarguable that

as Pope argued with a wink, ? he had merely showed ?what WoW?s pixels imply :).? Even sexual imagery, therefore, was nothing more than a rearrangement of what Blizzard?s artists had drawn, or more accurately, what its game engine generated during gameplay. Rather than asserting his right to subvert the game?s content, Pope reasoned that he had in fact not created anything on the screen, merely captured it.
So this film was deeply transformative ? bringing out what always existed in potential in the original ? by being pure reuse.

Full post as published by IP Law Daily on February 01, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0128 secs (new cache)