Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Jacksonville Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Jacksonville Personal Injury LawyerDoctors Want To Protect Their Reputations
By Eddie Farah
We’ve already warned consumers against signing binding arbitration documents when you go to the doctor’s office and are presented with a pile of paperwork to sign. Binding arbitration means you will never be able to sue a doctor if there is an unfortunate case of medical malpractice.
Now within that same pile of paperwork is another red flag for consumers to watch for. A group out of North Carolina called Medical Watch says its signed up about 2,000 doctors nationwide who present their form to their patients. Once signed, it prohibits you from speaking publicly online about your doctor.
Medical Justice founder and neurosurgeon, Dr. Jeffrey Segal, founded the company a few years ago to prevent so-called “frivolous lawsuits,” a favorite phrase to conger up hate for lawyers while implying a blanket of immunity for companies that do wrong.
The company’s “Mutual Agreement to Maintain Privacy” form promises the patient “will not denigrate, defame, disparage or cast aspersions upon,” the doctor. And you friends and family cannot either.
The prohibition applies to a service like Angie’s List, which launched a health-care rating service in March.
Founder, Angie Hicks told Florida Health News in an e-mail, “As a consumer advocate, I would oppose this practice as nothing short of an attempt to steal the consumers’ right to free speech.”
Whether you put your name on a post or not, make a positive comment or a negative one, the Medical Justice form applies.
“We’re not opposed to free speech,” Segal said to the publication. “The problem is the whole notion of being able to post anything you want. The physician can’t defend himself.”
However, one would presume if a post is public, a doctor would be able to also publish a post in response. Sounds dangerously like the suppression of free speech to me and a very bad public relations move if doctors want the public to have faith in them again.
Bottom line - when you sign up with a new doctor, read very carefully ALL of the paperwork you are asked to sign – if you see a binding arbitration form which keeps you from exercising your right to the courts, or a consent form not to speak, which violates your free speech rights – run the other way. #
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Eddie Farah
Full post as published by Jacksonville Personal Injury Lawyer on February 20, 2009 (boomark / email).
Placebos Instead of Meds
Nearly Half of US Doctors Involved
US Army Corps of Engineers
Class action dismissed for allegedly failing to protect New Orleans from the levee breach.
Racist Voicemail
Stamford Board of Education pays student $37,500 settlement after failing to protect her from racial discrimination.
Health Insurance
alleging health insurance companies have forced patients to pay more than they should when using doctors and hospitals outside their insurer's networks.
Drug Manufacturer Rebates
Caremark Corp. agrees to pay $38.5 million settlement after convincing doctors to switch drug brands.

Hillary Clinton Opposes Bush Plan to Protect Pro-Life Doctors on Abortion
Monitoring and Managing Corporate Reputations Online
Fourth Circuit strikes down Virginia late-term abortion restriction
Do Not be a Good Patient by Lying to Your Doctor
Poll Shows Americans Dont Know Law on Whether Doctors Must Do Abortions








