Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Strategic HR Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Strategic HR LawyerNew "QACA" Option for 401(k) Enrollment Can Eliminate Discrimination and Top Heavy Testing
As of January 1, 2008, 401(k) plans can begin to offer an alternative enrollment method which can eliminate the need for top heavy and discrimination testing. Called a "Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangement" (QACA), it requires certain minimum levels of deferrals. Here's how it works:
· all employees eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan must be covered except employees who either elect not to participate or elect to participate at a different contribution rate.
· the minimum automatic employee deferral percentage is 3% of compensation for the first and second years the employee is covered by the QACA, increasing by 1% each year thereafter to 4% in the third year, 5% in the fourth year and 6% for each year thereafter. The automatic contribution percentage cannot exceed 10% of compensation at any time.
· It requires a minimum level of employer contribution – either a matching contribution or a non-elective contribution
· employer contributions can be subject to a two year vesting requirement.
· a QACA must provide employees with a notice that explains the automatic enrollment provisions and the employee's right to elect not to participate in the arrangement or to participate at a different level.
· an employee can elect out of automatic contributions after they have begun and can withdraw contributions made under an automatic enrollment arrangement provided the withdrawal occurs within 90 days after the first automatic employee contribution is made. This permissible withdrawal is not subject to the 10% early distribution penalty tax.
OK, I'm not sure how you are supposed to pronounce "QACA" yet, but this article from Fisher & Phillips has a more comprehensive explanation of what it's all about.Full post as published by Strategic HR Lawyer on October 09, 2007 (boomark / email).
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Immigration Related Employment Discrimination & Unfair Labor Practices
What to do about employers who discriminate because of national origin
Shell Canada Proposes Heavy Oil Refinery
Air and Water at Risk in Michigan
Options Backdating
Former Broadcom executive settles $1.3 million stock option backdating lawsuit.
Tuberculosis Testing:
False Positives
Dirty Needles
Prompt HIV, Hepatitis Testing in Alberta
Undetected Sewage Spill
Prichard Water Works and Sewer Board spends $17 million on upgrades and testing.
Cancer Testing
Dianon Systems Inc. pays $1.5 million whistleblower settlement after billing for medically unnecessary tests.

Univ. of Missouri Officials Worried...
Fall 2007 Law School Enrollment Data
More on the Declining Enrollment of Minority Law Students
MPS student enrollment will decline, budget will grow (Surprise!)
Events: Two companies combine to offer enrollment-yield enhancement product
Minority Law School Enrollment Continues to Drop







