ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Tenth Circuit Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Criminal Law

: Tenth Circuit Blog

No Clear S.Ct. Precedent Requires States to Prove Every Element in Jury Instructions

By Shari Allison

ADVERTISEMENTS
Bates v. Workman, 2009 WL 294367 (2/9/09) (unpub'd) - No federal habeas relief under AEDPA was available for the state's failure to present sufficient evidence to prove an element that was in the jury instructions, but was not an element under state law. Under federal law, under the law-of-the-case doctrine, the government must prove every element in the jury instructions, even if the element is not really an element under federal law. But there is no clearly established Supreme Court law that the states must apply that law-of-the-case doctrine. Therefore no relief under AEDPA.

Full post as published by Tenth Circuit Blog on February 17, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0134 secs (new cache)