ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> JURIST - The Paper Chase

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: JURIST - The Paper Chase

Federal court rejects cases linking childhood vaccines to autism

By Bernard Hibbitts (editor) and University of Pittsburgh School of Law students.

ADVERTISEMENTS
[JURIST] The US Court of Federal Claims on Thursday rejected arguments made in three test cases against the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) by families alleging that their children's autism was caused by a combination of common childhood vaccines. Due to the case volume and complexity of the so-called Omnibus Autism Proceeding, the court ordered separate trials based on three distinct theories of liability under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and in 2007 court-appointed special masters began hearing three test cases for each theory. Thursday's judgments roundly rejected the first theory of liability, that the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella combination vaccine (MMR) vaccines and thimerosal-containing vaccines can combine to cause autism. In Cedillo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, a special master held that the evidence presented was "overwhelmingly contrary to the petitioners' contentions" and that the Cedillo family failed to demonstrate that the vaccinations at issue played any role in the child's autism. In Hazlehurst v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, the special master held that the combination of the thimerosal-containing vaccines and the MMR vaccine are not causal factors in the development of autism, and could not have contributed to the development of autism. In Snyder v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, a third special master held that the Vowell family failed to show by a preponderance of evidence that their child's autism was caused or significantly aggravated by a vaccine, adding that it was "abundantly clear that petitioners' theories of causation were speculative and unpersuasive." All plaintiffs have indicated that they will appeal the decisions. Special masters will continue to hear three cases on a second theory of liability - that thimerosal-containing vaccines alone can cause autism - with judgments expected this summer. Cases testing the final theory of HHS liability - that MMR vaccines alone can cause autism - have been dropped. Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative, has been at the center of several health debates. In 2005, HHS officials said that state laws prohibiting thimerosal could impede efforts to fight an avian flu pandemic should an outbreak occur. Most doctors believe thimerosal is safe, saying it does not affect the body in the same manner as mercury found in pollutants, but several groups claim that use of the preservative can be linked to neurological diseases including autism. Creation of mercury-free vaccines requires packaging individual doses, which is expected to pose a major problem if large batches of the vaccine need to be rushed in the event of an avian flu pandemic. Doctors partially attribute recent outbreaks of measles and other infectious diseases in the US to an increasing reluctance among parents to expose children to vaccines.

Full post as published by JURIST - The Paper Chase on February 12, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0137 secs (new cache)