ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> CalBizLit

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: CalBizLit

Reid v. Google: Evidentiary Objections in Summary Judgment Motions

By Bruce Nye

ADVERTISEMENTS

In practice areas where practitioners make heavy use of motions for summary judgment, there's been an ongoing controversy over how the courts treat evidentiary objections.  Biljac Associates v. First Interstate Bank (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1410 held that a trial court need not explicitly rule on objections on summary judgment.  Instead, it was presumed that the court had relied only on competent, admissible evidence.  Demps v. San Francisco Housing Authority (2007) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ overruled Biljac and held that any objection not ruled on was implicitly overruled. 

Trial court practice has been all over the map.  Some judges simply state they are deciding only on the basis of competent and admissible evidence.  Some rule on objections as part of their orders.  Some request a "check box" form of objections that allows the court to easily check boxes for "sustained" and "overruled." 

Appellate courts have had similarly diverse views:  some held undecided objections were "waived."  Some held that as long as the party making the objection made some effort to get a ruling, they were not waived.  Others have held that rulings are unnecessary and the objections are preserved as implicitly overruled.

The Cal Supremes have now taken up the issue in Reid v. Google, Inc.(2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 1342 (now unciteable).  This was a very pro-plaintiff employment law decision, wiped off the books as a result of the Court granting review.  The statement of issues on review indicates the issues will be the objections and the "stray remark" doctrine -- the extent to which a "stray remark" can be used in opposition to summary judgment to show unlawful discriminatory bias.

Off Topic Musical Post:  Francis Clay died in San Francisco on January 23.  For those who read this blog for the law and not the music, he was the drummer who drove the great Muddy Waters band in the first half of the 1960's.  He was a jazz drummer who couldn't make any money in jazz (c'est la change . . . ), so he learned to play the blues in Muddy's great band.  Here are Muddy Waters, James Cotton on harp and Francis Clay on drums at the Newport Jazz Festival, 1960.

Full post as published by CalBizLit on February 01, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0121 secs (new cache)