Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousLooking Ahead: Preclusive Effect of Prior Claim Construction
By Dennis Crouch, Esq.
Shire v. Sandoz, M-893 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
In a recent order, the Federal Circuit agreed to hear an interlocutory appeal considering the issue preclusive effect of a prior claim construction decision. The patent in suit has been construed at least twice before, but the lower court here "refused to give preclusive effect" to either prior ruling. This will be an interesting case to follow.
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on February 10, 2009 (boomark / email).
Ladder Accident Injury Claims
Were you or a loved one injured in a ladder accident?
New York Building Codes
Building and constructions laws in New York
Construction Site Accidents
Lawsuits related to accidents
Recovery Claim
Florida Insurance Guarantee Association agrees to pay $14 million settlement to Home Solutions of America for construction services.
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
AIG Settles Injury Claim
for $18 Million
Failure-to-accommodate claim yields $1.82M award
$1.82 Million Awarded in Employment Lawsuit
AnchorBank
$1.27 million in construction contract termination lawsuit.
MCM Construction
$6 million payout in banned, outdated vehicle use suit.

The Strategic Value of Patent Claim Construction
Patent Claim Construction Workshop
Assessing patent validity: Prior art can anticipate patent claim even if claim is non-obvious
Claim construction from different case against different defendant applies in subsequent case









