Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectRulings by two 9th Circuit judges aren?t precedentially binding
By ADF Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
LA Times: “Despite the prominence of the two judges, the rulings are legally meaningless for all but the two couples because they came in the court’s administrative dispute process, rather than in lawsuit judgments.”
See earlier post: Two 9th Circuit Judges grant same-sex ?spousal? benefits, one rules Federal DOMA is unconstitutional
Liberty Counsel has issued this press release: [...]Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on February 06, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Women and the Law
Women in the Justice System (judges, attorneys)
Lawsuits and Settlements
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Pennsylvania Juvenille Detention
Judges Face Class Action
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Courts - Still more on: DOJ moves to improve immigration judges, after months of criticism
Pair of notable circuit reasonableness rulings
It took two judges to write these federal appellate court rulings
"Rulings on Judge Complaints to Be Public"








