ADVERTISEMENT

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Legal Commentary

: The Volokh Conspiracy

Identity and the Exclusionary Rule: Why United States v. Farias-Gonzales Was Wrong To Apply Hudson v. Michigan Balancing:

By Orin Kerr

ADVERTISEMENTS

On Tuesday, the Eleventh Circuit handed down an important decision on the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule: United States v. Farias-Gonzales, written by Judge Cox, and joined by Judge Pryor and...

Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on February 06, 2009 (boomark / email).

Related Law Articles

Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations

Lawsuits and Settlements

Wrong Bus
Greenbrier County Board of Education agrees to $15,000 negligence settlement after dropping a 5-year-old off at the wrong spot.

Recall of TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count Sold in The United States and Puerto Rico
TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count One Lot Recalled in US and Puerto Rico

Michigan Employment Law
alleged violations of Michigan labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.

United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers

US Airways Flight 1549
Crashes into Hudson River

Suit Filed On Behalf of 400,000 Michigan Medicaid-Dependents Denied Access to Dental Healthcare
Michigan Medicaid Sued Over Dental Healthcare

Related Searches

US Law

#1 Online Legal Resource

Ask Legal Questions

US Law Directory

Class Action Lawsuits

Celebrity Justice

OJ Simpson

VIDEO: NYPD rendering first aid to Empire State Building shooter
On 08-25 at 15:46PM

Acute perpendicular parking #NYPD #NYFD
On 08-18 at 22:18PM

Parallel parking gone bad. Too much gas UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:41PM

UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:25PM

Twitter suspends journalist critical of broadcast partner's coverage on dubious grounds @guyadams #nbcfail #twitterfail
On 07-30 at 17:57PM

Model example of 1st Amendment suppression by the People of New York City's Michael Bloomberg #OWS #NYPD
On 07-12 at 21:07PM

AG Holder lackadaisical on Operation in our Sites domain name seizures & RIAA lobbied free speech suppression @dajaz1
On 06-08 at 22:44PM

Why is the Catholic Church going to court over Obama contraception policy? @NewYorker commentary
On 05-31 at 10:08AM

Monks sue Louisiana for right to sell caskets made from forrest destroyed by Katrina
On 05-31 at 07:47AM

Are the abortion ultrasound laws headed for the Supreme Court?
On 05-15 at 21:52PM

FOLLOW USLaw.com ON TWITTER

Custom Legal Documents

Your Blog Subscriptions Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc

Earn a law-related degree

Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.

Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Hudson v. Michigan - U.S. Supreme Court - exclusionary rule does not apply to knock-and-announce violations.

U.S. Supreme Court Holds Exclusionary Rule Does Not Apply to Invalid Arrest

Supreme Court Limits the Exclusionary Rule

"Eroding the Exclusionary Rule: Why the Supreme Court got it wrong in Herring v. United States."

OH: Hudson is premised on a valid warrant, which this was not; lack of any reference to time makes warrant void

Exclusionary rule and qualified immunity

0.019 secs (new cache)