ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: The Race to the Bottom

Shameful, Perhaps, But Treasury's Response Will Likely Cause More Harm Than Good

By J. Robert Brown

ADVERTISEMENTS

Barack Obama labeled the bonuses paid to officials at financial institutions taking funds under TARP as "shameful."  Senator McCaskill introduced a bill to cap compensation at the amount paid to the President ($400,000).  On Saturday, he described the payments this way:

  • “we learned this week that even as they petitioned for taxpayer assistance, Wall Street firms shamefully paid out nearly $20 billion in bonuses for 2008.” The American people will not tolerate “such arrogance and greed,” the president said.

Apparently Treasury will rush out new rules or standards early in the week to deal with these payments.  The project approach appears to be a significant mistake. 

Treasury is only targeting payments/bonuses for companies taking funds under TARP.  Moreover, the proposals under discussion differentiate among companies receiving bailout funds.  According to the WSJ, only those companies receiving "exceptional" aid will "be banned from receiving any severance payments and they, along with the top 50 executives, will see their bonus pools shrink by about 40% from 2007 levels." 

If the Government treats companies differently with respect to executive compensation practices, it will trigger the rule of unintended consequences.  Those who are more mobile will go the companies and banks not participating in TARP (the WSJ reported that so far at least 50 financial institutions have already rejected TARP funds), or to the companies in TARP subject to the least restrictions.  As a result, the very class of financial institutions that need the Government's help the most will see an outflow of talented management, potentially undoing the Government's goal of strengthening the financial markets, thereby lengthening the period of economic instability.

This is not a TARP problem.  It is a systematic problem.  Excessive compensation is harmful, whether or not paid to a CEO of a company participating in TARP.  Treasury needs to come up with a solution that makes reasonable all executive compensation, not just for those companies taking federal funds. 

Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on February 02, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0129 secs (new cache)