Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Journals Blogs -> Conflict of Laws
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Journals
: Conflict of LawsRome I: Commission Decision on the UK?s Opt-In Published in the OJ - Response to the UK Government?s Consultation
By Giorgio Buono
Following the publication in the OJ (no. L 10 of 15 January 2009, p. 22) of the formal Commission Decision of 22 December 2008 on the request from the United Kingdom to accept the Rome I reg. (see our previous post on the Commission opinion), the UK government has published the response to the public consultation launched in April 2008.
There were 37 responses to the consultation (see the detailed list in Annex A to the document), from the academic sector (5), commercial, financial and insurance organisations (18), consumer organisations (2), the legal sector (11) and the transport sector (1). The overwhelming majority of the respondents (95%) agreed that the UK should participate in the Regulation.
Here’s an excerpt from the conclusion (see also, on pp. 16-38, the article-by-article analysis, with the points raised by the respondents and the government response, as well as the comments on various issues relating to EC action in PIL matters, such as the UK’s position in future EU dossiers, the role of the ECJ and the Danish government’s ambition to put its opt-outs to a referendum):
104. The majority of respondents to the consultation were of the view that, given the satisfactory outcome of the negotiations, there was an advantage to British business if the rules determining the governing law were uniform throughout the EU. Aligning UK law in this respect to that in the rest of the EU would reduce legal expense and transaction costs. In addition, some respondents expressed the view that our original decision to opt out of the Regulation had helped to achieve the final positive result. However, they also made the point that if the UK did not participate in Rome I now, having achieved such a good result, it could significantly weaken the effectiveness of our right to not participate in future and damage our negotiating strength in relation to other EU dossiers.
105. [...] The European Commission adopted a decision to extend the application of the Rome I Regulation to the United Kingdom on 22 December 2008. The Ministry of Justice, the Department for Finance & Personnel (Northern Ireland) and the Scottish Executive will shortly progress implementation planning for the Regulation. The UK will be required to implement the Regulation by 17 December 2009.
106. By opting in to the Regulation, it shall be binding and directly applicable to the UK. The Regulation will apply to the UK (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) and also to Gibraltar. The UK?s participation in the Regulation does not, however, undermine the UK?s future use of the Protocol to Title IV of the EC Treaty.
(Many thanks to Federico Garau, Conflictus Legum blog, and to Andrew Dickinson)
Related posts:
- Insurance in Rome I: A Consultation by the Treasury and DCA From the HM Treasury website: In December 2005, the European...
- UK Government to opt-out of Rome I Regulation In a controversial decision, the UK Government has decided not...
- Rome I Regulation Published in the Official Journal The Rome I Regulation (see the dedicated section of our...
Full post as published by Conflict of Laws on February 01, 2009 (boomark / email).
The Paulson Toxic Mortgage Debt Security Act: The Biggest Government Bailout of All Time
Legislative Proprosal for Treasury Authority to Purchase Mortgage-related Assets
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Qui Tam Whistleblower - Government Fraud - Qui Tam Lawsuit
Qui Tam Whistleblower alleging fraud against the government reported by an individual acting as a government whistleblower.
Canadian Government
seeks new law enabling them to search your laptop
Federal Government
alleging discrimination against black farmers
US Government
alleging land surveyors should not be allowed on private property to build a US Mexican border wall.
US Federal Government
allegedly violated the niversal Declaration of Human Rights by deporting undocumented parents of US born children.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
alleging government agencies and officials violated immigrant workers' constitutional rights.

Govt puts off response on extending FOI coverage
Commission launches public consultation on keystone antitrust regulation
Madagascar Ratifies Rome Statute








