ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates

European Commission Attacks Practices That Prevent Competition From Generic Drugs

By Philip Brooks

ADVERTISEMENTS

A December 1, 2008 article that appears at mediLexicon states, in part:

The European Commission's 426 page Interim Report on the Pharmaceutical Sector (the "Report") , which was released on 24 November, makes no specific allegations of anticompetitive behaviour against particular companies but sets out in considerable detail how originators and generic manufacturers inter-connect within a highly regulated commercial environment. Originators are companies that develop and sell new medicines whilst generic manufacturers lawfully produce and sell equivalent medicines once the originators' patents expire.

The Executive Summary of the Report outlines many practices by originators which the Commission characterised as "shocking" in its press conference. These include:

  • Protecting their existing patents through a strategy of seeking additional secondary related patents, particularly nearer the time that the primary patent is due to expire. This practice of "patent clustering" is claimed to make it more difficult for competitors (including generic manufacturers) to develop innovative products.

  • Resorting very readily to litigation with generic companies, despite the likelihood of losing the case. The Commission implies that this practice is seen by the originators as a valuable way of delaying the entry on the market of rival products from manufacturers.

  • Settling litigation with some competing generic manufacturers on terms that might involve the transfer of alleged payments to the generic companies and which resulted in additional delays to the arrival of the generic manufacturers' products on the market.

  • Creating average delays of 4 months or more in national procedures for the approval of generic medicines by raising every manner of potential objection to such applications.

If the Commission...has evidence that payments by originators to generic manufacturers were motivated by the sole purpose of preventing new products coming to market in a timely way, then such a practice could be vulnerable to challenge under EU competition law. The Commission's dawn raids in the pharmaceutical sector on 24 November may have been motivated by this issue of "reverse payments".

Read the full article and access a link to the full European Commission report here.

Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on January 28, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0129 secs (new cache)