Home -> Law Blog Directory -> New York Blogs -> Sui Generis
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
New York
: Sui GenerisCarelessness Trumps the Exclusionary Rule
By Nicole Black, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
This week's Daily Record column is entitled "Carelessness Trumps the Exclusionary Rule." A pdf of the article can be found here and my past Daily Record articles can be accessed here.******Carelessness Trumps the Exclusionary RuleIn February 2008, I wrote an column about the U.S. Supreme Court?s decision to grant certiorari in Herring v. U.S. I predicted the court would conclude that the exclusionary rule did not apply to the facts of the case. At issue in Herring was whether the exclusionary rule should apply to evidence discovered during an unlawful arrest, when a suspect?s arrest is based on erroneous information...(This is a content summary only. If you're reading this anywhere other than an RSS reader, the content has been lifted. Please visit my blog, Sui Generis http://nylawblog.typepad.com , to read the entire post)
Full post as published by Sui Generis on January 27, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Is the Exclusionary Rule Consistent With Originalism:
Exclusionary rule and qualified immunity
Why Does the United States Have an Exclusionary Rule:
Originalism Does Not Support an Exclusionary Rule
The Supremes take a whack at the exclusionary rule
Response to Paul on Originalism and the Exclusionary Rule:








