ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Threat Level

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Threat Level

High Court OKs Illegal Searches Based on Computer Errors

By Ryan Singel, Kevin Poulsen, Sarah Lai Stirland, Kim Zetter, and David Kravets

ADVERTISEMENTS

Supremecourt Drug evidence found during an unlawful arrest arising from a police computer error could be used at trial, a divided Supreme Court says.

The 5-4 decision on Wednesday means that the nation's high court is distancing itself from the so-called "exclusionary rule" that prohibits police from using evidence obtained from illegal searches. In this instance, the court ruled that there was an innocent mistake: an erroneous computer record about a motorist stopped in traffic by Alabama authorities stating he had an outstanding arrest warrant, which made him eligible for an automatic search.

Four dissenting judges said the search, which found drugs and a gun, violated Bennie Dean Herring's Fourth Amendment rights to be free of unreasonable searches.

"The most serious impact of the court's holding will be on innocent persons wrongfully arrested based on erroneous information carelessly maintained in a computer database," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote(.pdf) in a dissenting opinion.

After an officer stopped Herring, a clerk messaged him that he was a fugitive who did not appear in court on a felony accusation. The officer subsequently searched Herring and found methamphetamine and a gun. Moments later, the clerk called back the officer and said the warrant had been vacated -- a fact that was not entered into the police's computer database.

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said evidence could be used against the motorist because the police mistake was a "negligent bookkeeping error" and that the authorities did not deliberately violate Herring's rights.

Photo: functoruser

See Also:



Full post as published by Threat Level on January 15, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0135 secs (new cache)