ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Banking Law Blogs -> Bank Lawyers Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Banking Law

: Bank Lawyers Blog

Barney Goes To Bat For Baytown Bank: Big Deal

ADVERTISEMENTS

Behind_Closed_Doors I wish I could get as worked up about the page one story in today's Wall Street Journal as many others have done. I simply cannot. The entire process of picking winners and losers in the bank bailout game totally lacks transparency and accountability. Cockroaches always roam in the dark, folks. Want to see them scurry to the sidelines? Turn on the lights. It's a law of nature. Seriously, you didn't expect that this was going on?

Try representing a bank that's having capital and/or management "issues," that's applied for TARP funds, and is desperately trying to get a straight answer from the regulators as to whether they will grant the bank enough time to raise the necessary private capital to match the TARP preferred stock investment, or whether everybody's wasting their time and money. Sometimes you get an answer, sometimes you don't, sometimes the answer's favorable, sometimes it's not, and you can't tell what is the reason for the difference. It's just...because.

The government doesn't have to justify the reasons for its decisions in picking winners and losers. If it did, if the decision-makers had to publicly justify the decisions they made as to who gets money and who doesn't, who lives and who goes bye-bye, how long do you think they'd stand straight in the face of the hurricane-force winds caused by equal parts gales of derisive laughter and howls of outrage, before being blown away? If they had confidence in the reasons for their decisions, why don't they explain those reasons publicly and in detail? What's your guess?

This is our government, my friends. A Congress dominated by the party of Barney and the Boyz, certainly, but chock-full of pachyderms just as venal and ready to intervene in the run for the gold. In a way, you can't blame them for figuring that anything goes, when as far as we unenlightened members of the public are concerned, the US Treasury Department and the federal bank regulators feed data into a mysterious black box, which then uses algorithms supplied by discredited Wall Street asset securitization model-makers to select the winners. Perhaps they throw darts at names tacked to the wall. Whatever the process, since all we can do is guess, don't be outraged that a herd of swine runs to the through and oinks loudly until it's filled by the mysterious food-giver.

I truly hope that this new crowd in the White House is really "the change we have been waiting for." I kind doubt it. The change I've been waiting for is usually accompanied by a mushroom cloud.

Full post as published by Bank Lawyers Blog on January 22, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.015 secs (new cache)