ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Alabama AG on Massey: Don?t Federalize Recusal Rules

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

wvaLet’s begin the day at One First Street, N.E., where the plot of the West Virginia Recusal Kerfuffle has recently thickened.

It’s been over a year since West Virginia’s supreme court overturned a $50 million jury verdict against Massey Energy. Shortly thereafter, if you remember, the court agreed to rehear the case after photos surfaced showing one of the judges, former Chief Justice Elliott “Spike” Maynard, and Massey’s CEO, Don Blankenship, whooping it up together in Monaco. Last May, the justices reaffirmed their November ruling in favor of Massey.

On March 3, the U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear the case, about whether the due process clause required a different justice, Brent D. Benjamin — who received more than $3 million in election funds from Massey CEO Blankenship but refused to disqualify himself from cases involving Massey — to step aside. (Click here for docs, compliments of Scotus blog; and click here for LB background.)

Many organizations have filed amicus briefs for the petitioner, including Public Citizen, NYU’s Brennan Center for Justice, the American Bar Association and the Committee for Economic Development.

Who might support Massey Energy and Justice Benjamin? None other than Alabama AG Troy King. And he’s asking his colleagues to join him. Here’s a report from the Charleston Gazette.

Dan Schweitzer, a lawyer for the National Association of Attorneys General, reportedly e-mailed a memorandum on Friday outlining Troy’s position to other attorneys general across the country. “The amicus brief will argue,” Schweitzer’s e-mail states, “that once a state has chosen its preferred method of selecting judges - whatever that method is - states should have the ability to police judicial participation through carefully constructed state recusal policies.

“In other words, making recusal a federal issue by ‘constitutionalizing’ it is unnecessary and, as a practical matter, unwise,” the e-mail states.

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on January 20, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0143 secs (new cache)