Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Crime & Federalism
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Crime & FederalismAdam Liptak on Judicial Pay
ADVERTISEMENTS
Adam Liptak, in this New York Times editorial, discusses some of the empirical research on judicial pay. The research proves, not surprisingly, that federal judges are not underpaid. They might actually be overpaid. Is anyone be surprised?Arguments in favor of judicial pay are "just because" arguments. When you ask someone to prove why judges should be paid more, you do not get rational argument. You do not get an appeal to facts or logic. You are told that judges should be given a pay raise just because they should - with an exclamation point added for good measure!Liptak notes the hypocrisy of this argument:What is most interesting about the basic argument made for a judicial pay raise is that it appeals to a value that many judges resist in other contexts...continue to full postFull post as published by Crime & Federalism on January 19, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Replacing Linda Greenhouse at the NYT...
Must-Read: Adam Liptak on U.S. Free Speech
SHOULD JUDGES HEAR CASES INVOLVING CONTRIBUTORS
Adam Liptak to Succeed Linda Greenhouse at NYT








