ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectRegulating Reproduction
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
Can?should?the United States abandon its laissez-faire, market- based approach to reproductive technology in favor of a regulatory model? In this Article, I conclude that some ART regulation is both constitutionally permissible and desirable. Part I analyzes the constitutionality of ART regulation. This Part also develops an ?interpretive? regulatory strategy that relies on related areas of law for policy guidance. Part II relies on this approach to develop regulatory standards and an organizational model to govern medical choices made by patients using ART. Part III, again relying on the interpretive approach, develops regulatory standards to govern the transfer of sperm and ova used in ART.Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on January 19, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Marsha Garrison on Regulating Assisted Reproductive Technology
Okamoto on Regulating Systemic Moral Hazard
Posthumous reproduction and todays military
Digital Reproduction May not Violate Copyright
Regulating Service Contracts in the EC
Regulating the Global Economy: Foreign Pharmaceuticals








