Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense WeeklyNew SCOTUS crim law opinions
By cdw
ADVERTISEMENTS
Harmful Error notes:
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued opinions in two criminal cases.
In Oregon v. Ice, the Court issues a 5-4 decision in which it holds that there is no constitutional violation based upon a judge’s imposition of consecutive sentences based upon facts that were not found by the jury. An Oregon statute provides that sentences for multiple crimes are to be served concurrently unless the trial judge finds that the crimes did not occur as part of the same course of conduct or resulted in separate harms. The majority opinion is authored by Justice Ginsburg and joined by Justices Alito, Breyer, Kennedy and Stevens. Justice Scalia authored a dissenting opinion which was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Souter and Thomas...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on January 14, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

No Crim Opinions from SCOTUS Today
Crowdsourcing SCOTUS for Quality Control
Speculating about SCOTUS sleeper cases
No big opinions, but some notable news from today's SCOTUS order list









