Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Feminist Law Professors
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Feminist Law ProfessorsNon-discrimination ordinances
By Tony Infanti
Apparently, the City of Kalamazoo, Michigan, has rescinded an ordinance that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in employment, housing, and public accommodations–just 6 weeks after it was enacted. The American Family Association of Michigan submitted approximately 1,600 signatures seeking repeal. That was enough signatures to require the city commission to repeal the ordinance or to put it on the ballot.
Locally, the Allegheny County Council is considering a similar nondiscrimination ordinance based on one that is now in effect in the City of Pittsburgh. (For those who aren’t familiar with the geography of Western Pennsylvania, the city and county are far from co-extensive. I, for example, live in Allegheny County but not in the City of Pittsburgh–though I do work in the city. This ordinance would effectively extend non-discrimination protections throughout the Pittsburgh metropolitan area.) After lobbying from the American Family Association of Pennsylvania, which unsurprisingly opposes the inclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity in the proposed ordinance, the ordinance has lost 3 sponsors. If any other sponsors defect, the ordinance will fail to pass. I encourage all readers in the Western Pennsylvania area to contact county council members to express their support for the ordinance prior to the public hearing that is scheduled for this Thursday, January 15th, at 5 p.m. in the Allegheny County Courthouse. To take action on this issue, please click here. I also encourage as many people as possible to show up at the hearing in person because you can count on the opposition to turn out!
-Tony Infanti
Full post as published by Feminist Law Professors on January 13, 2009 (boomark / email).
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Immigration Related Employment Discrimination & Unfair Labor Practices
What to do about employers who discriminate because of national origin
Drive Through Discrimination
Jack-in-the Box pays undisclosed racial discrimination settlement to two customers.
Housing Buyer Discrimination
White homeowner settles $30,000 buyer-discrimination lawsuit.
American State Bank Discrimination
$225,000 settlement reached in hiring discrimination lawsuit.
Religious Discrimination
NMSU to pay $165,000 in Muslim discrimination settlement.
Age Discrimination Suit Settled for $8.75 Million
Age Discrimination Class Action Settled for $8.75 Million
Elderly Floridians Win Discrimination Class Action
Florida to Pay $27M Elderly Floridians Win Discrimination Class Action

Oliveri on Landlord-Tenant Issues and Anti-Illegal Immigrant Ordinances
Louisiana: City Council passes sex shop ordinances
Columbia, SC bans discrimination based on gender identity
Utah Puts Zoning Ordinances On-Line Model for Other States to Follow
Massachusetts: Transgender activists remove clothing in public








