ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Obama Citizenship Blogs -> The Right Side of Life

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Obama Citizenship

: The Right Side of Life

Schneller v. Cortes: Justice Souter Denies Emergency Stay Application

By Phil

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Supreme Court docket (see also “Supreme Court Info” on the sidebar) for Schneller v. Cortes (Pennsylvania resident James Schneller, pro se Plaintiff) shows the following:

Jan 7 2009 Application (08A592) for a stay, submitted to Justice Souter.
Jan 8 2009 Application (08A592) denied by Justice Souter.

Mr. Schneller alleges that Pennsylvania’s certified ballots were improperly transmitted to the federal government due to a stay of such activity:

UPDATE:  Justice John Souter denied the application on Thursday January 8, 2008.  It cannot be ascertained whether the application was denied before or after the joint session of Congress tallied the vote.     Pennsylvanian James D. Schneller filed an Application for Emergency Injunction in the United States Supreme Court on December 31, 2008, requesting a stay of the Count of the electoral vote at the joint session of Congress, because Pennsylvania’s certified ballots of the Pennsylvania electoral college were transmitted to the Speaker of the Senate and other officials improperly, because a stay of that activity was in force, because of petition for mandamus No. 199 MM 2008, pending in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Mr. Schneller asked that the emergency action be presented for urgent action to the appropriate Judge, and notified 250 of our Senators and Representatives of this development. 

He hasn’t decided whether or not to resubmit his application to another Supreme Court Justice at this time. However, Mr. Schneller did mention that “I’ll probably be appealing from any PA Supreme Court denial regardless.”

A current listing of eligibility lawsuits can be found here.

Excerpted details of the case follow…

 The case is captioned: 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

No. 08A592In Re: James D. Schneller 
James D. Schneller, applicant 
v.
Secretary of the Senate, Vice President Richard B. Cheney and the Congress of the United States of America, Barack Obama, respondents     

APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY

Application for emergency stay, injunction, or writ of mandamus to Secretary of the Senate Richard B. Cheney, the Congress of the United States of America, and Barack Obama, due to lack of jurisdiction over the certified vote of the electors of the State of Pennsylvania, pursuant to pending case in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania No. 199 MM 2008: James D. Schneller v. Secretary of the Commonwealth Pedro A. Cortés, Pennsylvania Bureau of Commissions, Elections, and Legislation, Senator Barack Obama

    In this motion, Mr. Schneller states new reasons for a general stay to the joint session’s tally of the electoral vote, beyond those reasons accumulating in this and related cases, including that: 

  ” The Court has further authority to prohibit respondents’ inclusion of some State’s electors certified votes, pending proofs directed to be filed by Mr. Obama, because he has not proven his qualification to any State, nor the Federal Election Commission, nor the Secretary of State of the United States or any other official. Worse, the Democratic Party has erroneously and fraudulently certified the eligibility and qualification of their party’s candidates to any States having a requirement for such, and has in the same manner certified the party nomination to the remaining States, where required. 

     The Pennsylvania electors for the Democratic Party were  .  . sworn as to lawful fulfillment of their duty, at the electoral college, but again, in 2008, as in 2004, they did not subscribe these oaths in writing, as is required of them under Pennsylvania Constitution Article VI Section 3. No certificate promulgated in the sequence of certifications states that the electors were duly sworn. . . . “ 

     The motion was immediately served on Vice President and Secretary of the Senate Richard B. Cheney, leadership of the Senate and House including Robert Byrd, Nancy Pelosi, John Boehner, and Mitch McConnell, and Barack Obama.   Barack Obama has filed an answer in the Pennsylvania action.

-Phil

Full post as published by The Right Side of Life on January 08, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 10/31/26 11:33:10)