Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogLevitin on Upstream Regulation of Credit Markets
By Lawrence Solum
Adam Levitin (Georgetown University - Law Center) has posted Hydraulic Regulation: Regulating Credit Markets Upstream (Yale Journal on Regulation, Vol. 26, 2009) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
Consumer protection in financial services has failed. A crisis is now playing itself out in the mortgage, credit card, auto loan, title loan, refund anticipation loan, and payday loan markets. Consumer protection was a traditional element states' regulatory power until federal preemption ousted states from almost all direct regulation federally-chartered banks without substituting equivalent protections and enforcement.
This Article argues that one avenue may remain to permit states to engage in consumer protection regulation of federally-chartered banks. Recent changes in financial markets have placed the majority of consumer debt in the hands of secondary market entities, such as securitization trusts and debt collectors, which are not protected by federal preemption. States' ability to directly regulate the secondary consumer debt market also gives them the ability to indirectly regulate the primary market, even when direct regulation would be preempted.
States can impose targeted regulatory costs on the secondary market tied to the presence or absence of particular terms in consumer debts, regardless of what type of institution initiated the debt. By tying regulation to the terms of the debt, states can channel the hydraulic force of the market, which will pass these costs on to the originators of the debts - including federally-chartered banks. This would create an incentive for originating lenders to adjust the terms under which they originate consumer debts so as to avoid state regulatory costs. This Article contends that such regulation would not run afoul of preemption doctrine because it does not directly regulate federally-chartered banks; it affects them only indirectly, through the market.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on January 08, 2009 (boomark / email).
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Bankruptcy Law
A complete prime (pre-2005)
Collection Agencies and Creditors
How to deal and stop the harassment
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
TransUnion
Class action credit practices suit offers free credit monitoring services for millions.
Robert Fresh Markets Win $21.6 Million Insurance Lawsuit
Robert Fresh Groceries Wins $21.6 Million Katrina Insurance Lawsuit
Wells Fargo Faces Potential Class Action Over Home Equity Credit Lines
Wells Fargo Faces Potential Class Action over Home Equity Credit Lines
Citibank
Will Repay $14 Million to Credit Card Customers
LOWE's
Faces Class Action for Credit Card Violations
Chase Bank
Faces Class Action over Credit Card Rates

Adam Levitin Responds to ABA Study on Regulation of Credit Cards
Federalist Society event on Congressional regulation of credit markets
How Does the Current Credit Crisis Parallel the Situation in the 1930's
SEC's Trading and Markets Director Testifies on Market Turmoil
Regulation of "Economic" Markets vs. Regulation of the Market for Culture and Ideas:









