Obama Citizenship

Martin v. Lingle: Letter to HI Deputy AG: ?Judge should be recused?

By Phil

Andy Martin, Plaintiff of Martin v. Lingle, today sent out the following press release via email of a letter he is sending to Hawaii Attorney General Jill T. Nagamine asking for a rehearing and a new judge:

I am going to prepare a new motion for rehearing and ask that the judge be recused for bias and that the matter be reheard by a new judge. The issue of the cover-up of official documents by apparently corrupt and conspiratorial judges and lawyers, and other local officials in Hawai’i, is not going to go away, not today, not next week, not ever. Justice must not only be served, justice must appear to be served.

The full presser follows…

January 6, 2009

Jill T. Nagamine
Deputy Attorney General
425 Queen Street
Honolulu, HI96813
via fax (808) 587-3077

with copy to:

Hon. Bert I. Ayabe
Circuit Court
777 Punchbowl Street
Honolulu, HI96813-5093
via fax (808) 539-4108

Re:
Martin v. Lingle
Circuit Court No. 08-1-2147-10-BIA

Dear Attorney Nagamine:

This will respond to your cover letter and proposed order of today’s date.

I am getting the creepy feeling that the Hawai’i courts are operated as a secret society. You sent me a proposed ruling on my motion for reconsideration, and I have not even been advised the motion has been addressed and ruled on. How do you know what is going on before I do? The motion to reconsider was unopposed by your office. It should have been granted as an unopposed motion. Now there is some form of communication between your office and the judge, to which I am not a party. Not a party indeed.

Judicial proceedings should not only be fair and impartial; they should appear to be fair and impartial. The proceedings involving manipulation of Hawai’i’s official records do not even remotely pass the smell test. The entire nation has been horrified by the abusive treatment I have received in Hawai’i.

Your proposed order makes the false claim that I neglected to sign my motion for reconsideration. I did no such thing. I signed it.

Furthermore, I do not even know at this point who the opposing lawyer is: you or the judge. Even if through some oversight there was an unsigned motion, that oversight was waived by your lack of a response or lack of any opposition. That is how a local lawyer’s oversight would be treated. I am receiving invidiously discriminatory treatment.

The judge seems to be acting and lead counsel in the cover-up of Obama’s birth certificate and raising issues that you have failed to raise or waived. In other words, the judge is not acting as a judge; he is acting as an “activist seeking combat” and trying to act proactively to feed you objections. That is not the proper role of a judicial officer. Therefore, your unsupported claim that I failed to sign my motion is both an outrageous accusation and apparent evidence of judicial bias against an out-of-state litigant.

I find the treatment afforded me as a respected writer seeking access to a historic document as bearing the obvious taint of corruption and conspiracy. I do not feel I have even remotely been afforded a neutral forum.

I am going to prepare a new motion for rehearing and ask that the judge be recused for bias and that the matter be reheard by a new judge. The issue of the cover-up of official documents by apparently corrupt and conspiratorial judges and lawyers, and other local officials in Hawai’i, is not going to go away, not today, not next week, not ever. Justice must not only be served, justice must appear to be served.

When a judge says he is protecting the “privacy” rights of the president-elect of the United States, who has waived any privacy by posting a facsimile of the document on the Internet, the judge is making a joke of the judicial function and trivializing a good faith effort to invoke Hawai’i law.

The suspicious behavior of Hawai’i officials is doing incalculable damage to the administration of Barry Obama. The election eve “verification” that a secret document existed was a bald-faced political act by a supposedly impartial professional official. Do you think we are all stupid on the mainland?

We need to know who this man is. His birth certificate from 1961 obviously contains hidden horrors. Otherwise, why should there be such resistance to public access for a historic document?

I am going to fight this corruption and abuse of the judicial system in Hawai’i.

I began fighting judicial corruption in Illinois over forty years ago as a young law student; it looks like I will now have to add a new state to my list of crooked judicial systems, Hawai’i.

Respectfully submitted,

ANDY MARTIN

AM:sp

-Phil

Full post as published by The Right Side of Life on January 06, 2009 (boomark / email).