Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Anticipate This!
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Anticipate This!Welker Bearing Co. v. Phd Inc.
By Jake Ward
ADVERTISEMENTS
The generic terms “mechanism,” “means,” “element,” and “device,” do not connote sufficiently definite structure to avoid means-plus-function treatment.
(Fed. Cir. 2008, 08-1169)
The U.S. District Court (E.D. Virginia) granted summary judgment of noninfringement of Welker Bearing Co.?s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,786,478 (??478 patent?) and 6,913,254 (??254 patent?) in favor of PHD, Inc. The CAFC affirmed the summary judgment, [...]Full post as published by Anticipate This! on January 04, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

CAFC Provides Further Guidance on Means-Plus-Function
Cross-Bearing Elderly Woman Attacked by Gay Marriage Supporters; Cross is Stomped
License to Discriminate: Choose Life License Plates and the Government Speech
SJ grant of noninfringement affirmed by CAFC







