ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Obama Citizenship Blogs -> The Right Side of Life

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Obama Citizenship

: The Right Side of Life

Candidate Qualification: Hawaii, South Carolina Certifications

By Phil

ADVERTISEMENTS

Justin Rigg’s continued work at yourfellowcitizen.com (highlights tracked here) keeps getting closer to the question of who, exactly, is responsible for qualifying candidates for federal office. As Justin comments concerning the Hawaiian paperwork:

There’s a law in Hawaii that states that the political party MUST declare their candidates as eligible:

HRS 11-113
 
(c)  All candidates for President and Vice President of the United States shall be qualified for inclusion on the general election ballot under either of the following procedures:

     (1)  In the case of candidates of political parties which have been qualified to place candidates on the primary and general election ballots, the appropriate official of those parties shall file a sworn application with the chief election officer not later than 4:30 p.m. on the sixtieth day prior to the general election, which shall include:

         (A)  The name and address of each of the two candidates;

         (B)  A statement that each candidate is legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution;

         (C)  A statement that the candidates are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national party, giving the time, place, and manner of the selection.

So now I have answers to two of my three questions, for both parties.

1) Who was responsible for ensuring these candidates were qualified? For the Republicans, it was John Boehner, Jean Inman, and Willes Lee. For the Democrats, Nancy Pelosi, Alice Travis Germond, Brian E. Schatz, and Lynne Matusow.

2) When were the candidates certified as eligible? For the Republicans, September 4th of 2008. For the Democrats, the 28th of August. (Which makes me wonder about the 60 day provision of the statute).

3) What evidence was presented by the candidates that allowed for a determination of eligibility to be made? WELL, NOW WE KNOW WHO TO ASK!

I find this fairly exciting. If people want to write letters, this is who they should be writing them to. If people want to sue - this is who they should be suing. These are legal documents, sworn before a notary public. Falsifying them is a crime.

PDF documentation:

-Phil

Full post as published by The Right Side of Life on December 22, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0139 secs (new cache)