Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Thoughts in a Haystack
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Thoughts in a HaystackPassages
By John Pieret
ADVERTISEMENTS
div align="justify"br /a href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_BQtYCYJpONQ/RYmlNcDBErI/AAAAAAAAAHA/4_wWBYJyMVg/s1600-h/Judge+Jones.JPG"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5010717710712115890" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_BQtYCYJpONQ/RYmlNcDBErI/AAAAAAAAAHA/4_wWBYJyMVg/s400/Judge+Jones.JPG" border="0" //aThanks to the Discovery Institute for reminding me that today is the third anniversary of Judge Jones' so far ihighly/i influential decision in ema href="http://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/kitzmiller/kitzmiller_342.pdf"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School Board/a/em. Happy Birthday!br /br /I won't bother to link to John West's little blurb, since it is just a series of links to the DI's bogus arguments (a href="http://dododreams.blogspot.com/2007/03/do-they-have-insurance-for-this.html"such as/a that Judge Jones "cut and pasted" from the ACLU's proposed findings of fact), a couple of contrary (if not contrarian) opinions from legal authorities who, for the most part, have little grasp of what ID is (or, more correctly, iisn't/i, namely science) and citing the exchange in the emMontana Law Review/em between West (a non-lawyer), Casey Luskin (barely a lawyer) and David DeWolf for the DI and Professor Peter Irons, which has, to say the least, an a href="http://dododreams.blogspot.com/2006/12/liar-liar.html"interesting/a a href="http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2007/06/irons_responds_to_west_luskin.php"history/a.br /br /Of course, if the DI really thinks that Judge Jones' decision was so bad, I suppose we can expect them to be out beating the bushes for another test case ... so all those DI "experts" who had to withdraw at the last moment can have another shot at using Billy Dembski's famous vise on the "Darwinists."br /br /Let's all take a deep breath now ... and ihold/i ...br /span style="color:#ffffff;"./span/divimg src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThoughtsInAHaystack/~4/491093089" height="1" width="1"/Full post as published by Thoughts in a Haystack on December 20, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

No Reprieve for Khristian Condemned by Bible Passages
Reflections on the politics of SCOTUS and personhood of its members
Alex Brown: OOXML is like a baroque castle with secret passages and crumbling towers









