Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Construction Law Blogs -> Home Contractor vs. Homeowner
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Construction Law
: Home Contractor vs. HomeownerWhy is it important whether the builder/contractor is incorporated?
By Andrea Goldman, Esq.
In general, the reason to incorporate a business is to protect one's individual assets from creditors. For that reason, and others, many businesses incorporate. A corporation is like a separate individual. So, if you obtain a judgment against a corporation, you can only collect against corporate assets. Sometimes contracting companies own trucks or equipment, but in general, they do not own valuable assets. So, before investing money in a claim or lawsuit, it is important to figure out if there is anything to collect against at the end of the day.
Of course there are other reasons to incorporate as well. There are tax implications, branding and marketing reasons (to protect a particularly catchy name), and other financial and business reasons.
In Massachusetts, a designee of the corporation is jointly and severally liable for a violation of the Home Improvement Contractor Statute. That means that the designated individual can be held individually liable for a violation. It is important for contractors to know this and make sure to follow the law before they start going after homeowners for money, etc. Contractors do not want to be held invidually liable under the law and subject their assets to seizure!
Full post as published by Home Contractor vs. Homeowner on July 23, 2007 (boomark / email).
TomoTherapy Incorporated
NASD: TOMO
Government Overbilling
Defense contractor to pay $8.9 million settlement in fraud lawsuit.
TomoTherapy Incorporated
401k / ERISA Stock Fraud

Is Senator Obama a "Bob the Builder" fan
Depressed Debtor Denied Bankruptcy For Destroying Records
Michigan Legislature Enacts "Owner Built Residence Transfer Act"
Delays by a Contractor’s Supplier Do Not Fall Within the Prime Contract's Force Majeure Clause
Can a Letter of Credit Substitute for a Performance and Payment Bond








