ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Religion & Law

: Religion Clause

Illinois Supreme Court Says Challenge To Pharmacy Rules May Move Ahead

By Howard M. Friedman

ADVERTISEMENTS
Inem a href="http://www.state.il.us/court/OPINIONS/SupremeCourt/2008/December/104692.pdf"Morr-Fitz, Inc. v. Blagojevich/a,/em (IL Sup. Ct., Dec. 18, 2008), the Illinois Supreme Court in a 5-2 decision, overturned lower courts and held that plaintiffs had stated a justiciable challenge to a State Board of Pharmacy rule that requires pharmacies to dispense the "morning after pill" even if pharmacists or pharmacy owners have a conscientious objection to doing so. While the lawsuit was pending, the state amended its rule to permit objecting pharmacists to avoid dispensing the drug if a pharmacist at a remote locations authorizes a non-pharmacy employee to sell the drug to a customer. The Court a href="http://www.state.il.us/court/OPINIONS/SupremeCourt/2008/December/Summaries/104692s.htm"summarized/a its holding as follows:br /blockquotePlaintiffs are two licensed pharmacists and three corporations that own and operate pharmacies.... [T]he pharmacists brought this preenforcement challenge ... [claiming] that this rule is null and void on its face as in violation of the first amendment and statutory law....br /br /In this decision, the ... Court held that the action was ripe for judicial review and should not have been dismissed. It held that legal issues were presented that did not require agency expertise and that the stores had shown disruption of their business despite the absence of actual enforcement. The requirement that administrative remedies must be exhausted before filing suit in circuit court was not applicable here..../blockquoteThe dissenters argued that plaintiffs had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies before filing suit. a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h39ki-Oi9lRg7b4YQzXN0ZyIa2RgD955FI200"AP/a yesterday reported on the decision. (See a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2007/03/illinois-court-dismisses-pharmacists.html"prior related posting/a.)

Full post as published by Religion Clause on December 19, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0315 secs (new cache)