Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Icahn Report
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Icahn ReportMore Rights for Shareholders in North Dakota
By Carl Icahn
North Dakota may be cold this time of year, but shareholder activists are looking to make it a hot destination for public companies.
©iStockphoto.com/csreed
Last year, partly as a result of a campaign I backed, North Dakota changed its laws to strengthen shareholder rights at public companies incorporated there.
Now some shareholders have proposed resolutions to be placed on corporate ballots in 2009 to relocate their companies to the state. More are expected to follow.
Long-time shareholder activist John Chevedden, for instance, said he has filed relocation proposals to be included on proxy statements at 15 public companies.
For Chevedden, the move is a no-brainer. Historically, states like Delaware, where a majority of U.S. public companies are incorporated, give shareholders little power to influence company affairs and strategy. But last year, North Dakota became the most shareholder-friendly state in the nation.
"If a company moved to North Dakota, it could cure five items of corporate governance at once," Chevedden told the Icahn Report.
The move is likely to meet opposition from company managements, since it erodes their control over companies that shareholders own. And when shareholders make proposals managements don?t like, they typically ask the SEC for a ruling to exclude these proposals from the company?s annual meeting proxy statement, in an effort to keep shareholders from supporting the measure.
The SEC, however, hasn?t previously shown much willingness to challenge shareholder resolutions to reincorporate in other jurisdictions, according to Race to the Bottom, a legal blog.
Chevedden said the SEC has already rejected one company request to discard a shareholder proposal from its proxy materials relating to jurisdictional relocation.
Still, under current law, to be binding, a corporate relocation resolution must be approved by the board. Therefore, the proposed shareholders resolutions being pressed by Chevedden are merely "precatory," or advisory, meaning that managements don?t have to adopt any shareholder proposal they don?t like. But Chevedden said if such proposals win widespread shareholder support, managements ignore them at their peril.
What?s different about North Dakota corporate law? Lots. And the state is looking to use the provisions to attract lucrative business from corporations that incorporate there, just as Delaware gains a substantial portion of its state revenue from companies incorporated in that state.
If companies choose to sign up in North Dakota under the provisions of the new law, they are limited from instituting anti-takeover provisions like poison pills and staggered boards. Such provisions thwart a company from being taken over and have its assets better redeployed under different managements.
In addition, it requires that the board chairman and CEO jobs be separated, and requires advisory shareholder votes on executive compensation.
It also allows shareholders owning five percent of the outstanding shares for two years or more to nominate directors and they must be put on a company?s proxy statement.
These rules and a number of others in the North Dakota statute vary significantly from Delaware?s and would go a long way to give shareholders more rights to bring accountability to managements.
There are numerous long-standing reasons why these changes are essential. But most importantly, they come at a time when shareholders need to exercise more influence at companies which have suffered massively this year as a result of the market meltdown.
Clearly, much of the meltdown occurred as a result of the failure of boards to properly clamp down on managements who took excessive risks that brought down their companies, particularly those in financial services.
This is unacceptable and must be changed. This is why I have founded United Shareholders of America ? to give shareholders more power over the companies they own. It is only when large numbers of stockholders unite that we can push back against the entrenched and unresponsive boards and managements in this country.
Sign up for USA on my blog, The Icahn Report. www.icahnreport.com.
Full post as published by The Icahn Report on December 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Lead-Contaminated Meat
N. Dakota Issues Warning
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
Grubb & Ellis
alleging violations of fiduciary duties to shareholders and securities laws.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Common Stock Shareholders
LaBranche & Co. LLC agrees to $13 million securities fraud class action settlement.
Nissan North America
alleging brake defects that cause the 2005 Infiniti G35 brakes to wear out faster.

North Dakota shareholder law experiment
Shareholder Proposals and the North Dakota Publicly Traded Corporations Act
Estate Planners Needed in North Dakota
Law.com: Has Law Review Been Hijacked by the Relgious Right
ND: Some complain Law Review biased against gay marriage
Shareholder Proposals and the North Dakota Public Corporations Act








