ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Thoughts in a Haystack

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Religion & Law

: Thoughts in a Haystack

Don't Let the Door ?

By John Pieret

ADVERTISEMENTS
div align="justify"br /a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_BQtYCYJpONQ/SUnFKzWu5cI/AAAAAAAADE8/x2rEWxsPcms/s1600-h/Bush+Exit.jpg"img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5280968827443537346" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 231px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 320px" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_BQtYCYJpONQ/SUnFKzWu5cI/AAAAAAAADE8/x2rEWxsPcms/s320/Bush+Exit.jpg" border="0" //aAnother reminder of a href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/article/850"why we won't miss him/a when he's gone:br /br //divblockquotep align="justify"Another organization, the Union of Concerned Scientists, has documented hundreds of instances of political interference throughout government agencies charged with researching ? and then regulating ? issues of public and environmental health and safety. This past spring, UCS followed up earlier investigations at the FDA, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration with a survey of scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency. Of the 1,586 staff scientists who responded to a questionnaire, 889 said they had experienced some political interference.br /br /Two-hundred and eighty-five said they had experienced ?selective or incomplete use of data to justify a specific regulatory outcome.? And 224 said they had been ?directed to inappropriately exclude or alter technical information from an EPA scientific document.?br /br /?What we?ve seen under President Bush,? said Michael Halpern, program manager of UCS?s Scientific Integrity program, ?is a culture of secrecy and suppression where if scientific information doesn?t fit with predetermined policy decisions they wanted to put forward, that scientific information was summarily distorted, suppressed or misused to justify the decisions they wanted to make.? /p/blockquoteimg src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThoughtsInAHaystack/~4/488272552" height="1" width="1"/

Full post as published by Thoughts in a Haystack on December 17, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0157 secs (new cache)