Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Alabama Appellate Watch

Appellate Law

: Alabama Appellate Watch

The Ninety-Day Rule Strikes Again: Untimely Appeal Dismissed

p class="LFWBlank" style="margin: 0in 0in 12pt"span style="font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'"font size="3"In ua href="http://www.alabamaappellatewatch.com/uploads/file/mcaffee.pdf"McAfee v. Garrison/a/u, No. 2070857, released December 12, the Court of Civil Appeals dismissed an appeal as untimely where the fatherrsquo;s notice of appeal was not filed within 42 days of the denial of his post-judgment motions as a matter of law. /font/spanspan style="font-size: 7pt; font-family: Arial"o:p/o:p/span/ppThe trial court entered a judgment on January 10, 2008 modifying the custody provisions of a divorce decree.nbsp;The father filed a timely motion to alter, amend, or vacate on January 25, 2008 and the trial court purported to enter an order denying the fatherrsquo;s postjudgment motion on May 1, 2008.nbsp;The father filed his notice of appeal on June 6, 2008./p p style="margin: 0in 0in 12pt"Although filed within 42 days of the trial courtrsquo;s purported denial of his postjudgment motion, the fatherrsquo;s notice of appeal was untimely.nbsp;As Rule 59.1 provides, no post-judgment motion shall remain pending in the trial court for more than ninety days.nbsp;If the trial court fails to dispose of such motions within that time, they are deemed denied by operation of law.nbsp;/p p style="margin: 0in 0in 12pt"Here, the fatherrsquo;s postjudgment motion was denied by operation of law on April 24, 2008 and the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter the May 1, 2008 order from which the father calculated his time to file a notice of appeal.nbsp;Because the notice of appeal was filed more thannbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; forty-two days from the date his postjudgment motion was denied by operation of law, the fatherrsquo;s appeal was due to be dismissed./pimg src="http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/AlabamaAppellateWatch/~4/487929475" height="1" width="1"/

Full post as published by Alabama Appellate Watch on December 17, 2008 (boomark / email).