ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Law Daily

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: IP Law Daily

MPAA Urges Obama to Embrace Internet FilteringWired: Threat Level

ADVERTISEMENTS

Mpaa

The Motion Picture Association of America is urging the incoming Obama administration to adapt internet filtering technology to block illicit file sharing of motion pictures and television shows.

The Hollywood studio lobbying organization, in a position paper posted on Obama's transition website -- change.gov -- writes that a top priority is "the fight against online piracy, including through automated detection and removal of infringing content." The group said it was "imperative to curb the theft of online content."

The paper, (.pdf) posted this week, comes as the incoming 44th president will be charged with nominating the nation's first copyright czaras part of legislation lawmakers approved months ago. The position paper marks the first time the motion picture lobby has publicly confirmed it was pressing the incoming administration to adapt its filtering vision, and it comes shortly after the Federal Communications Commission openly embraced internet filtering.

Toward that goal, the MPAA openly requested filtering information from technology companies. Eleven companies and a university responded, sharing their filtering visions and technology. The companies are: Advestigo, Audible Magic, Auditude, Gracenote, Intellivision, Magix/AudioID, NTT, Philips, Thomson, University of St. Andrew of Scotland, VidyaTel and Vobile, an MPAA spokeswoman said.

"We see filtering as a tool moving forward to detect copyrighted materials going through the pipes," spokeswoman Elizabeth Kaltman said in a telephone interview.

What about fair use?

"If I upload a copy to the internet, that's not a fair use issue. I'm trading infringing content. This is not a fair use argument," Kaltman said.

The industry and government claim billions of dollars in revenue and hundreds of thousands of jobsare lost to piracy.

Network-level filtering technology is already emerging. Google, for example, has adopteda copyright filtering system for its popular YouTube video sharing site. And internet service providers' willingnessto adopt filtering is well documented.

After all, many of these same telecommunication companies helped the Bush administration spy on Americans without warrants, and then convinced federal lawmakers, including Obama, to grant them immunity from being liable in court for that behavior.

See Also:


Full post as published by IP Law Daily on December 10, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.012 secs (new cache)