Patent Law

Google triumphs over ILOR

By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.

On the merits, we
conclude that the district court correctly construed the sole claim limitation at issue, and
did not abuse its discretion by denying iLOR?s motion for preliminary injunctive relief
because noninfringement was undisputed under that construction. Thus, we affirm the
district court?s denial of injunctive relief and dismiss the remaining issues raised in this
appeal, which relate to matters that remain before the district court.

Full post as published by IPBiz on December 11, 2008 (boomark / email).