Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> BRB's Public Records Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: BRB's Public Records BlogNorth Dakota Adopts Privacy Protection Measures for Court Records
Amendments to North Dakota's Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rules of Court, and Supreme Court Administrative Rules and Orders were adopted on December 3, 2008.
On March 1, 2009, significant changes to electronic and paper filings, including the redacting of information, will go into affect. For example, within the Rules of the Court, Rule 3.4 - Privacy Protection for Filings Made with the Court - provides for the following items to be redacted:
"Unless the court orders otherwise, in an electronic or paper filing with the court that contains an individual's social-security number, taxpayer-identification number, or birth date, the name of an individual known to be a minor, a financial-account number, or, in a criminal case, the home address of an individual, a party or nonparty making the filing must include only:
(1) the last four digits of the social-security number and taxpayer-identification number;
(2) the year of the individual's birth;
(3) the minor's initials;
(4) the last four digits of the financial-account number; and
(5) in a criminal case, the city and state of the home address."
A synopsis of the complete amendments can be viewed at www.ndcourts.com/court/notices/20080201/contents.htm
Full post as published by BRB's Public Records Blog on December 08, 2008 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Medical Records
To Stay out of Pharma's Hands
Lead-Contaminated Meat
N. Dakota Issues Warning
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
AOL Privacy Class Action
Can Proceed
CVS Mailing
Sparks Allegations of Privacy Violation

This week in public records: North Dakota - California - Tennessee - Kentucky - Missouri - Alaska
Estate Planners Needed in North Dakota
Student Privacy Rights Opinion
Law.com: Has Law Review Been Hijacked by the Relgious Right
Paralegal Costs May Be Recovered








