ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> JURIST - The Paper Chase

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: JURIST - The Paper Chase

Federal judge limits 2006 ruling banning road construction in national forests

By Bernard Hibbitts (editor) and University of Pittsburgh School of Law students.

ADVERTISEMENTS
[JURIST] A federal judge on Tuesday ruled that her 2006 decision invalidating a 2005 Bush administration rule that would allow road construction and mining in national forests applies only to 10 western states. The original Roadless Area Conservation Rule, implemented by former US President Bill Clinton in 2001, was replaced by the Bush administration with a rule allowing governors to request that regulations on the management of roadless areas be developed to meet the needs of individual states. Under the 2006 ruling by Judge Elizabeth Laporte of the US District Court for the Northern District of California, the reinstated Clinton-era rule would have prohibited mining, logging, and road construction in the forests of 38 states and Puerto Rico, totaling more than 58 million acres of land. In August another federal judge ruled that the Clinton-era rule was invalid. The Bush administration asked that the two conflicting decisions be reconciled, so Laporte amended her 2006 decision to apply to only 10 western states. The Wilderness Society, a plaintiff in the original case, has called on the Bush administration "to refrain from using a decision by a federal judge as an excuse to knock down protection for an estimated 13.6 million acres of roadless national forests in 29 states." Cases are currently pending in federal courts in San Francisco and Denver, and the incoming Obama administration could also make changes to the rule. In her 2006 decision, Laporte found in favor of 20 environmental groups and California, Washington, New Mexico, and Oregon, which sued the US Forest Service. Attorneys for Earthjustice representing the environmental groups in the case praised the decision, but members of the timber industry and other opponents criticized the ruling, saying states should be able to manage their own forests by using citizen opinion polls.

Full post as published by JURIST - The Paper Chase on December 03, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0126 secs (new cache)