Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> ACS Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Constitutional Law
: ACS BlogNew Federal Rule Seen As Broad Assault On Certain Healthcare Services
A new Health and Human Services (HHS) regulation would reach well beyond protecting physicians and nurses who refuse to provide abortions. The so-called “right of conscience” regulation that the Bush administration is working to implement before its term expires, is aimed at covering more healthcare workers who cite religious or moral objections to an array of medical procedures, such as abortions and artificial insemination, the Los Angeles Times reported. The newspaper noted that for more than 30 years, federal law has allowed physicians and nurses to refuse to provide abortions and that the new proposed regulation would apply to “any entity” receiving federal funds. According to HHS officials 584,000 entities, including hospitals, physician’s offices and pharmacies, may well be covered by the new rule, which the administration hopes to finalize before President-elect Barack Obama takes office in January. Additionally, the newspaper reported that the new regulation “would go further by making clear that healthcare workers also may refuse to provide information or advice to patients who might want an abortion.”
The newspaper noted that the new HHS regulation has received support from religious groups, such as the Christian Medical Association (CMA) and the U.S. Conference on Catholic Bishops. David Stevens, head of the CMA, told the Los Angeles Times that, “The real battle line is the morning-after pill. Doctors should not be required to dispense medication they have a moral objection to.”
Groups and institutions, such as the American Medical Association, the American Hospital Association and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) have argued against the new regulation, saying it places health workers’ religious beliefs before patients’ health. The ACOG’s Committee on Ethics wrote that, “Although respect for conscience is important, conscientious refusals should be limited if they constitute an imposition of religious or moral beliefs on patients [or] negatively affect a patient’s health.”
Full post as published by ACS Blog on December 02, 2008 (boomark / email).
Pre-paid Leagal Services
What are Prepaid Legal Benefit Plans
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Cell Phone Services
AT&T Mobility may have to pay $10 million to Florida customers after charging for third-party services.
Suit Filed On Behalf of 400,000 Michigan Medicaid-Dependents Denied Access to Dental Healthcare
Michigan Medicaid Sued Over Dental Healthcare
Skilled HealthCare Settles Class Action for $50 Million
Skilled HealthCare Settles Class Action for $50 Million
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc
SKH
Healthcare Payout
Merge to pay $250,000 upon settling derivative lawsuit.
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud

Austin Police Seek Help in Broad Daylight Sexual Assault
Broad Conscience Clause Rule from Bush Administration
FTC Approves New Rule Provision Under The CAN-SPAM Act
Federal Court Upholds San Francisco Healthcare Program
New Federal Medical Refusal Rule Would Reach Beyond Abortion
Ex-security guard awarded 824,000 for sexual assault www.privateofficer.com









