ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Conglomerate

Advice for the Obama Administration

By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring

ADVERTISEMENTS

I was pleased to be asked by the Legal Times (they've got a nice blog, too) to chime in on how the Obama Administration should handle the bailout.  I think the new team will have to weigh how far to push its extremely broad authority against the usefulness of good governance style collaboration with Congress.  That's not just a bailout issue, it implicates the separation of powers and so on.  You can find a gated version of my ponderings here, and here's a taste:

Consider the flexibility the administration will enjoy under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act?s executive compensation scheme. The bailout statute provides only that the Treasury secretary ?shall require that? participating institutions ?meet appropriate standards for executive compensation and corporate governance.? Because defining those appropriate standards has been left to Treasury, there is nothing preventing the next administration from enacting, with the stroke of a pen, a more European model of management pay.

That would certainly be novel, but it is hardly the limit of the government?s flexibility. The Treasury Department also has authority to invest in institutions in exchange for equity, to purchase assets of those institutions outright, to devise an insurance scheme, and to issue ?such regulations and other guidance as may be necessary or appropriate to define terms or carry out the authorities or purposes? in the statute. Those purposes are many, but they include ?the need to help families keep their homes and to stabilize communities? and to promote ?jobs and economic growth.?

When coupled with the ability to impose conditions by contract on the recipients of bailout largesse, one can get a sense of just how innovative the Obama administration could be.

For example, though the Community Reinvestment Act has its critics, if ever there was a time when the administration might be able to encourage financial institutions to set hard targets and benchmarks for investment in the impoverished areas of the country, now is it.

Nor need the administration stop there. As industrial companies begin to line up for their own shares of government largesse, nothing in the bailout statute prevents the Obama administration from requiring a contractual commitment to a card-check scheme from the nonunionized among them in exchange for an injection of equity.

Full post as published by Conglomerate on December 02, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/06/26 19:14:14)