Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Criminal Review
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Criminal ReviewR. v. Palmer
ADVERTISEMENTS
A decision handed down just prior to Mahalingan (comment) on issue estoppel that highlights one of the practical problems courts will face.
The accused had been charged with possession, which also led to him being in breach of his conditional sentence. At his breach hearing, before his trial on the possession charges, the judge found (on the balance of probabilities) that possession had not been proven. So, was the issue of possession one the Crown was now estopped from arguing?
Yes.
Crown Couns read more
Full post as published by Criminal Review on December 02, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Former Cy Young Pitcher Jim Palmer Wins Malpractice Suit After Botched Eye Surgery
Disqualifying Judges through Contributions
Palmer v. State, No. 4D08-2047 (Fla. App. 10/8/2008) (Fla. App., 2008)
Bengals QB Carson Palmer Joins Feud Between Jeff and Nancy








