ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Trademark Law Blogs -> AntiCybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Trademark Law

: AntiCybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Blog

The Many Names of Cybersquatting

By Enrico Schaefer

ADVERTISEMENTS

United States federal law enacted the ACPA to provide a remedy for cybersquatting.  Cybersquatting requires a domain registrant to register, traffic in, or use a domain name that incorporates "a mark that is distinctive at the time of registration of the domain name, identical or confusingly similar to that mark, and possess "a bad faith intent to profit" from that mark.  As cybersquatters become more sophisticated and trademark holders become more intent on protecting their intellectual property, new names have been used to more specifically define the kind of cybersquatting.  Nonetheless, the ACPA elements required above remain the same for the following forms of cybersquatting.

Typosquatting

Typosquatting capitalizes off of the typographical errors made when typing a domain name into the web.  Misspellings, the addition of www (e.g. www.wwwcnn.com), and additional or different top-level domains (e.g. www.cnncom.com or www.cnn.org) are common typosquatting errors.  Typosquatting is particularly harmful to trademark owners and domain monitoring and defensive domain name registrations are effective way to minimize this form of cybersquatting.

Pornosquatting

Pornosquatting is a variation of typosquatting.  A pornosquatter forces a domain name to resolve or redirect to a website containing pornographic material.  This form of cybersquatting can be one of the most harmful to a trademark holder's image and should be remedied as soon as possible.

This list is not all inclusive and the ways cybersquatters are capitalizing off of the valuable trademarks of others are constantly evolving.  An experienced cybersquatting attorney can provide proactive ways to avoid some of these forms of cybersquatting.  A cybersquatting attorney can also provide advice and a solution when a trademark owner has been the victim of one of these forms of cybersquatting.

Domain Tasting

Domain tasting occurs when domain registrants use the free five-day domain registration grace period to test or "taste" the amount of traffic and ad revenue a particular domain name can generate.  The decision of whether or not to keep the domain beyond the grace period depends upon the profitability of the domain name. 

Domain Kiting

Domain kiting, a variation of domain tasting, occurs when domain registrants repeatedly abuse the five-day domain registration grace period by deleting the domain name before the grace period expires and then re-registering the domain name to reset the grace period.  This allows domain kiters to postpone payment for the domain name.

Domain Lapse

Cybersquatters use various technology tools to register domain names after the domain name registrant fails to renew the domain. Domain lapse can happen to any domain name registrant for failure to pay the annual registration fee.  While the redemption periods of domain registrars may provide a "second chance" of sorts for domain name registrants, proper domain name portfolio management can prevent what can become a costly oversight.

Domain Frontrunning

One of the more popular cybersquatting topics of late, domain frontrunning occurs when a domain name availability search of the so-called public WHOIS database by an interested and potential domain name registrant causes the particular registrar to register the domain name and force the potential domain name registrant to purchase the domain through that particular registrar.  The solution is simple - use one of the various proprietary WHOIS databases, such as Domain Tools, that will not front run the domain.

Domain Warehousing

While this form of cybersquatting has had its definition change over the years, domain warehousing allows a registrar as well as a registrant to accumulate domain names incorporating the valuable trademarks of known trademark owners.  Particularly harmful to registered trademark owners, domain warehousing is strong evidence of bad faith.

Full post as published by AntiCybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Blog on January 28, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0222 secs (new cache)