Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Trademark Law Blogs -> Domain Name Dispute Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Trademark Law
: Domain Name Dispute BlogCircumstantial Evidence in Domain Disputes
By Enrico Schaefer
The Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service has just issued a decision in the Apple Computer Inc. v CyberBritain Group Ltd. Not unexpectedly under the facts presented, Apple Computer Inc. won this domain name cybersquatting arbitration and will receive by court order its domain itunes.co.uk to it.
In this case, Apple registered for UK trademark, and shortly thereafter the respondent registered the itunes.co.uk mark. For a period of time, the itunes.co.uk domain simply redirected users to other commercial sites. In the meantime apple had launched itunes software. The cybersquatting respondent tried to leverage its domain name with a competitor of itunes, Napster. The cybersquatter did however deny that that they had any idea that Apple was going to launch itunes when they registered the domain. The arbitrator found that, on the balance of probabilities, the respondent registered the domain name in bad faith and detrimental to the rights of Apple. She ordered the domain name be transferred to complainant.
This decision is a good example of how circumstantial evidence is very powerful in the domain name resolution forum. Because there is far less evidence available to arbitrators, they are forced to make findings of fact based on records that are far less involved than in an actual civil litigation. Based on the circumstantial evidence and in the face of denials an arbitrator can find ?based on the probabilities that bad faith registration existed.?
Full post as published by Domain Name Dispute Blog on August 10, 2005 (boomark / email).
Employment
Employee rights including labor law, harassment, safety, unpaid overtime, discrimination and union disputes.
Network Solutions and ICANN
allegedly registers searched domain names to prevent others from selling and forces customers to pay expensive fees.
Eminent Domain
University of Akron pays property owner $443,000 settlement.
The Plainfield School District
$10,500 settlement resolves eminent domain dispute.
Downtown Improvement
Springfield to pay more than $2.5 million settlement in eminent domain lawsuit.
Condo Eminent Domain
Maui pays $4.1 million settlement to property owner.

More and more domain name disputes
Cybersquatting and Intellectual Property Laws
Domain History Blocking Comes to Domain Tools
Cybersquatting and Domain Name Dispute Lawyers
Domain Name Disputes and the Right of Publicity
Domain Extension Mobilizes Organizations to File Disputes







