ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> SCOTUSBLOG

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: SCOTUSBLOG

Detainees want deadlines kept

By Akin Gump Supreme Court Practice Group

ADVERTISEMENTS

Accusing government lawyers of a “consistent strategy of obstruction and delay,” attorneys for Guantanamo Bay detainees are urging a federal judge not to relax the timetables he has set to enable the prisoners’ legal challenges to move forward.  In a series of responses, filed over the past several days, detainees’ counsel asked Senior District Judge Thomas F. Hogan to make no change in his procedural framework for some 114 cases involving about 200 captives.

In fact, some of the detainees’ lawyers urged Judge Hogan not to act at all on the government’s sweeping plea for changes in the case management order the judge has issued for those cases.  The filings contended that Justice Department lawyers have failed to get together with detainees’ counsel for discussions before asking Hogan to make those changes; local court rules require some such encounter.  (A post discussing the changes proposed is here, and post about a temporary stay order by Hogan is here.)

The detainees’ responses have not been consolidated. The filings, numbering more than 20, can be found on the District Court’s website on the docket for 08-442 — Judge Hogan’s omnibus case on detainees’ habeas procedures — under docket entries beginning with 1027 and continuing, amid some other filings.  Further responses are expected during the day Wednesday — the deadline for responses.

In opposing key features of Judge Hogan’s scheme for processing Guantanamo habeas cases, the Justice Department requested that, if those changes are not made, the judge clear he way for the government to pursue a prompt appeal to the D.C. Circuit Court.  Detainees’ lawyers countered in their responses that the case management order is not the kind of ruling that is subject to appeal.

Full post as published by SCOTUSBLOG on November 26, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.013 secs (new cache)